Overcoming the challenges of translating research into a research paper or book is a multifaceted process for me. I have discovered that one of the most effective strategies is to actively discuss and share my research with a variety of people. This dialogue not only solidifies my understanding, but also helps me to envision my prospective readers and their expectations, guiding the focus and structure of my writing.

Time management, however, emerges as the most daunting aspect of research. There are myriad approaches to managing time, but I have found that setting realistic deadlines tied to achievable goals is crucial. This practice creates a sense of urgency and direction, helping me to stay on track.

Another key tactic is breaking down the larger project into smaller, manageable segments. This approach allows me to celebrate minor victories along the way, each small success propelling me forward to the next task. Paying attention to details such as formatting during the writing process is also part of this strategy. These seemingly minor tasks contribute to a growing sense of completion, reinforcing my belief in the feasibility of the project.

Collaboration plays a vital role in my research endeavors as well. Working in a team has been instrumental in bringing many of my projects to fruition. Research, by its very nature, often requires a collective effort, and I attribute every success to the collaborative spirit and contribution of each team member. This sense of camaraderie and shared purpose not only aids in overcoming the practical challenges of research, but also enriches the entire process, making the journey towards completing a research paper or book both feasible and fulfilling.

One key reading that has profoundly influenced my academic and personal journey is Robert K. Merton’s Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge, published in the American Journal of Sociology in 1972. This article delves into the creation and functioning of disparate worldviews, offering valuable insights not only for sociology, but also for other disciplines like psychology, political science, economics, and philosophy, as well as interdisciplinary fields such as area studies and science and technology studies.

Merton’s exploration of the insiders/outsiders dynamic was a cornerstone in my doctoral dissertation, where I used his framework to analyze information exchange during the early days of the coup d’état in Thailand in 2006. This concept continues to be a critical element in my current research on Thai materials within and outside Thailand, particularly in addressing the power inequalities in bibliographic culture.

Beyond its academic relevance, Merton’s work has profoundly impacted how I understand and interact with worldviews different from my own in everyday life. It has reshaped my thinking and approach to living in a world rife with disputes and conflicts. The fluidity of the insider/outsider distinction is something I find applicable in various contexts, even in seemingly small, everyday situations.

While Merton’s classic work can initially be challenging to read — it certainly was for me, requiring several rounds of reading to grasp its core ideas — the effort is rewarding. The insights I gained not only deepened my understanding of my research topics, but also led to a greater self-discovery and a broader perspective on my own place in a complex world. For aspiring researchers, especially those in the social sciences and humanities, Merton’s article offers a timeless, profound perspective on understanding the dynamics of knowledge, power, and cultural representation. It is a must-read for those who seek to deepen their comprehension of the intricate tapestry of human thought and society.

 (January 2024)